Showing posts with label debate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label debate. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

People/Opinion/Debate

Are there risks to taking lower paid jobs that don't exemplify your skills while waiting for a better opportunity to come along?

YES: Taking a lower paying job exhausts your creative energy and may prevent you from finding the right one. I do not agree that it's okay to take a lower-paying job while waiting for a better opportunity to come along. What if it comes along while you're on the job? Additionally, while you're slaving away at base wages, you're not out there pursuing that dream job. It might seem like low-risk behavior to take on a job that's beneath you to pass the time, but it could be the biggest mistake of your life.

NO: The benefits outweigh the risks in taking a lower paid job while waiting for a better opportunity. It does not look good on a resume to have a long period of time without work. Even if the job doesn't exemplify your skills, you are showing your work ethic and can always explain what you were doing during this time. Most people can learn valuable lessons from any job. Take a lower paid job could also lead to better opportunities at a company, and be an important foot in the door.

What's your Opinion?

Sunday, September 16, 2012

People/Opinion/Debate: Should children under the age of 18 be allowed to use Facebook?


YES: I think children under the age of 18 should be allowed to use Facebook, with some limitations. Though, ultimately, it is up to parents to protect their children from misbehaving on Facebook. I think Facebook should be open to children under the age of 18, so long as they are subject to more stringent posting restrictions and their profiles are not visible to the general public.

NO: Too many children under 18 have chosen to use Facebook as a tool for harassing, and their access to Facebook should be banned. Children under the age of 18 have few boundaries. Facebook offers a huge canvas on which they can publish whatever provocative posting they wish. The consequences can be minimal for the poster and dire for the victim. They can also be dire for the poster, since the cyber-world has at least as many predators as the natural world. Because Facebook is so widely available, its members should be screened by age, at the very least.

What's your Opinion?